Changes in the Sun's Surface to Bring Next Climate Change
January 2, 2008
Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando,
Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of
NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in
the sun's surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and
has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of
a long lasting cold era.
Today, Director of the SSRC, John Casey has reaffirmed earlier
research he led that independently discovered the sun's changes are
the result of a family of cycles that bring about climate shifts from
cold climate to warm and back again.
"We today confirm the recent announcement by NASA that there are
historic and important changes taking place on the sun's surface. This
will have only one outcome - a new climate change is coming that will
bring an extended period of deep cold to the planet. This is not
however a unique event for the planet although it is critically
important news to this and the next generations. It is but the normal
sequence of alternating climate changes that has been going on for
thousands of years. Further according to our research, this series of
solar cycles are so predictable that they can be used to roughly
forecast the next series of climate changes many decades in advance. I
have verified the accuracy of these cycles' behavior over the last
1,100 years relative to temperatures on Earth, to well over 90%."
As to what these changes are Casey says, "The sun's surface flows have
slowed dramatically as NASA has indicated. This process of surface
movement, what NASA calls the "conveyor belt" essentially sweeps up
old sunspots and deposits new ones. NASA's studies have found that
when the surface movement slows down, sunspot counts drop
significantly. All records of sunspot counts and other proxies of
solar activity going back 6,000 years clearly validates our own
findings that when we have sunspot counts lower then 50 it means only
one thing - an intense cold climate, globally. NASA says the solar
cycle 25, the one after the next that starts this spring will be at 50
or lower. The general opinion of the SSRC scientists is that it could
begin even sooner within 3 years with the next solar cycle 24. What we
are saying today is that my own research and that of the other
scientists at the SSRC verifies that NASA is right about one thing - a
solar cycle of 50 or lower is headed our way. With this next solar
minimum predicted by NASA, what I call a "solar hibernation," the SSRC
forecasts a much colder Earth just as it has transpired before for
thousands of years. If NASA is the more accurate on the schedule, then
we may see even warmer temperatures before the bottom falls out. If
the SSRC and other scientists around the world are correct then we
have only a few years to prepare before 20-30 years of lasting and
possibly dangerous cold arrive."
When asked about what this will mean to the average person on the
street, Casey was firm. "The last time this particular cycle
regenerated was over 200 years ago. I call it the "Bi-Centennial
Cycle" solar cycle. It took place between 1793 and 1830, the so-called
Dalton Minimum, a period of extreme cold that resulted in what
historian John D. Post called the 'last great subsistence crisis.'
With that cold came massive crops losses, food riots, famine and
disease. I believe this next climate change will be much stronger and
has the potential to once more cause widespread crop losses globally
with the resultant ill effects. The key difference for this next Bi-
Centennial Cycle's impact versus the last is that we will have over 8
billion mouths to feed in the next coldest years where as we had only
1 billion the last time. Among other effects like social and economic
disruption, we are facing the real prospect of the 'perfect storm of
global food shortages' in the next climate change. In answer to the
question, everyone on the street will be affected."
Given the importance of the next climate change Casey was asked
whether the government has been notified. "Yes, as soon as my research
revealed these solar cycles and the prediction of the coming cold era
with the next climate change, I notified all the key offices in the
Bush administration including both parties in the Senate and House
science committees as well as most of the nation's media outlets.
Unfortunately, because of the intensity of coverage of the UN IPCC and
man made global warming during 2007, the full story about climate
change is very slow in getting told. These changes in the sun have
begun. They are unstoppable. With the word finally starting to get out
about the next climate change, hopefully we will have time to prepare.
Right now, the newly organized SSRC is the leading independent
research center in the US and possibly worldwide, that is focused on
the next climate change. Some of the world's brightest scientists,
also experts in solar physics and the next climate change have joined
with me. In the meantime we will do our best to spread the word along
with NASA and others who can see what is about to take place for the
Earth's climate. Soon, I believe this will be recognized as the most
important climate story of this century."
More information on the Space and Science Research Center is available
at: www.spaceandscience.net
__________________
Netrider member #23 OFARC #40
Εγώ δεν ήμουνα αλήτης, αλήτη μ' έκανες εσύ -Dimitiris Kontolazos
“If you hear that someone is speaking ill of you, instead of trying to defend yourself you should say: "He obviously does not know me very well, since there are so many other faults he could have mentioned"-Epictetus (Greek philosopher AD 55)
When I studied the science subjects at Uni back in the day (91+), this is pretty much the conclusions we all came to from various stuff we had records of (Timelines and temperature recordings available) that an ice age was "due some time". It was just as the term "Global Warming" was coming in that I recall and from what we saw, there was gonna be a "little" bit of overall warming and then either a big drop in temp and/or iceage type of event.
Let's see how things pan out, in my view we have f*ck all say in world wide stuff. Some recent data has shown something like 40% (or was it 60%?) of so the good ol' global warming gases came from methane (i.e cow + sheep poop) and as an overall, humans weren't as much to "blame" as publically stated.
But as we know, a group is more likely to get funding when using global warming as opposed to global cooling as the topic of their research in the past few years
Yeah, I've heard the arguments against global warming. They talk about the masses of carbon dioxide generated by plant matter in the time before humans, far more than todays man made emissions.
What they fail to mention is that almost all of those emissions were generated by decaying matter on the floor of forests and that the emissions were reabsorbed and regulated by those same forests.
Plus, I am sure the nature of our C02 emissions are quite different from natural emissions. Our emissions carry toxic impurities and dust particles and are ejected high into the atmosphere.
Whichever way they want to look at it, humans are devastating our planet in many many many areas. This solar activity may combine with natural and manmade conditions to bring about a cold period or even an iceage.
The thing is, if we weren't at almost seven billion and adding so much of our own waste into the equation, it might have been that this sunspot cycle would not induce as strong a reaction from the planet's environmental systems, and the cold might have been diverted for longer.
And, to say that the scientific community is bending the truth or concocting a global conspiracy is just phuckn hilarious. What an utter load of bollocks.
One thing is for sure. Change, on a large enough scale to upset many many millions of people, is coming. It won't be us that suffers so much, just the rest of humanity for as long as humans have left on this planet. Humans don't have a manifest destiny, but everyone thinks we do.
But hey, what do I care. I'm gonna be dead in fourty years or so. In the mean time, I'm just gonna ride my motorcycle
And, to say that the scientific community is bending the truth or concocting a global conspiracy is just phuckn hilarious. What an utter load of bollocks.
Why would you say that?
For the record i am not ignorant of the damage humans are doing to the environment and i do believe that it is changing the globe's temperature.
But why would you totally discount the conspiracy? Politicians bend the truth all the time for their own agendas, why wouldn't scientists?
__________________
"F$#@ing Chuck Norris" - White Goodman
Jesus, first it was "Global Warming" then made a little more vague with "Climate Change" and now it's an "Ice Age".
Make up your bloody minds, you bored, over-educated self indulgent wankers. Stick with writing ghost stories or apocolyptic movie scripts, they scan much better.
__________________
The Internet:
More crap at your fingertips.
Than on them.
Plus, I am sure the nature of our C02 emissions are quite different from natural emissions. Our emissions carry toxic impurities and dust particles and are ejected high into the atmosphere.
o_0 natural CO2 is different to human CO2???
it is true though, volcanic clouds don't go very high into the atmosphere, don't have dust, and also don't carry toxins like Hcl, S02, HF, H2SO4....
Quote:
Jesus, first it was "Global Warming" then made a little more vague with "Climate Change" and now it's an "Ice Age".
actually it was ice age first.
the impending iceage was the big worry of the 70s. and this isn't predicting an iceage, just an extreme cold period of 30 years or so
.. so get your riding done NOW, because when THAT'S over, all the land is going to be flooded with rising oceans, and the price of Jet-Skis is going to go through the roof!!! .
__________________
Paul
Some say he can post on NR without an internet connection.
Some say when he speaks at the end of each sentence he says 'submit'.
All we know is - he's The Hornet.
port80
As far as I can see the whole global warming debate seems to be centred on ourselves, rather than on the planet itself. Correct me if I'm wrong but haven't CO2 levels been ten times higher at periods than today, and life seems to keep going. Dinosaurs were all wiped out but the planet still kept going. I spose the point I'm getting at is that its humans that are more likely to die than the planet itself, maybe that's the reason this subject is so emotive?
__________________
Speed has never killed anyone - suddenly becoming stationary... That's what gets you
We are headed for an ice age according to NASA
